I never had a formal mentor. I had to work a lot of things out myself, and I relied on line managers, supervisors and legal-friends to bounce ideas off.
The lack of a traditional mentor shows that you can make progress without one. At the same time, I have seen first-hand how powerful mentoring can be:
For students looking for mentors:
A mentor does not have to be a partner. A trainee, NQ or even a fellow student a year ahead of you can be incredibly helpful.
University schemes, diversity initiatives and charities like Urban Lawyers can match you with people.
Come to mentoring conversations with specific questions or decisions you are thinking about, rather than just “please mentor me”.
And if you cannot find a formal mentor, create informal ones: a supportive friend, a family friend in another profession, or even a community of peers can play a similar role.
After events, send a short thank-you email or LinkedIn message to the speaker, mentioning one specific point you found helpful.
You do not need to bombard people. Liking their LinkedIn posts, commenting occasionally, or sending a brief update once or twice a year keeps you on their radar.
I built a huge amount of my network through my legal Instagram account. Students can do the same: share your journey, interact with others, and over time, those online interactions can lead to real-life connections.
Even as a student you can recommend an event, share an article someone might find interesting, or volunteer to help with a project.
Professional relationships grow from repeated, respectful, low-pressure interactions – not one dramatic networking conversation.
When mentoring students and junior lawyers, a few recurring mistakes come up:
Some mentees arrive hoping a mentor will magically unlock a training contract or a job. A mentor can guide and challenge you, but they cannot do the applications, networking or graft for you.
Coming to a session with nothing specific to talk about – no questions, no CV, no applications to review . The best mentees come with clear questions, a draft they want feedback on, or a decision they are struggling with.
Sometimes mentees tell mentors what they think we want to hear – exaggerating how many applications they have done or hiding the fact that they are burnt out. Mentoring only really works if you are honest about where you are and what you are finding difficult.
A very common pattern is: great conversation, lots of ideas, then… nothing happens afterwards. The most successful mentees are the ones who come back having done the thing they said they would do – even if it did not go perfectly.
Some mentees spend most of the session talking about what friends are doing. That comparison energy can drown out the real question: “What is the next right step for me?”
Mentees sometimes feel they are “bothering” the mentor by checking in. In reality, a brief update a few months later – “I followed your advice and here is what happened” – is exactly what most mentors love to hear.
If you can avoid those pitfalls and instead be honest, prepared, and proactive, you will get far more out of any mentoring relationship – whether with a partner, a trainee, or even a peer.
I try to build learning into my week rather than treat it as a separate project:
I read updates on platforms like LexisNexis and Practical Law, as well as blogs and articles from other family lawyers and chambers. I often turn those updates into posts for my own Instagram, which forces me to understand them well enough to explain them simply.
I write articles, blogs and give talks and podcasts on family law topics. Having to teach or explain something is one of the best ways to deepen your own understanding.
I am a trustee of a separated parenting programme charity and help with their blog and Instagram. Being involved in something slightly outside my day-to-day practice stretches different skills and perspectives.
So growth for me is a mix of formal reading, creative output, and putting myself in roles that stretch me.